Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Stefanos Tsitsipas vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tsitsipas vs Gimeno-Traver analysis and find out who is favored!
Stefanos Tsitsipas vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tsitsipas 1 - 0 Gimeno-Traver
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tsitsipas has won 53.55% of points on his second serve, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tsitsipas, in recent form, has won 50.53% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.65% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tsitsipas has saved 71.28% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tsitsipas has won 65.75% of matches played (W/L 48/ 25), with Gimeno-Traver winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tsitsipas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 187/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 59% (W/L 24/ 17). Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/ 369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Tsitsipas has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 65.52% of matches (W/L 19/ 10), where as Gimeno-Traver has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tsitsipas winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tsitsipas winning 1 and Gimeno-Traver winning 1. The last match between Tsitsipas and Gimeno-Traver was at the Mohammedia Challenger, 06-10-2016, Quarterfinals, Clay with Stefanos Tsitsipas getting the victory 4-6 5-3 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tsitsipas and Gimeno-Traver have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tsitsipas winning 1 times and Gimeno-Traver 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tsitsipas winning 0, and Gimeno-Traver 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tsitsipas has played against opponents with an average rank of 118.08 while Gimeno-Traver has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tsitsipas has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tsitsipas has converted 42.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
9
Rank
3
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
48
High
38
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
68% (490-233)
Career Total W/L
57% (625-479)
74% (25-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$19,118,690
Career Prize Money
$1,102,200
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tsitsipas VS Gimeno-Traver H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Stefanos Tsitsipas | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 1 |
| Games Won | 9 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:38 | 1:10:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (37/60) | 77% (40/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (26/37) | 70% (28/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (15/23) | 50% (6/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (18/52) | 32% (19/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tsitsipas VS Gimeno-Traver H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 5-3 ret. |
Stats 
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Stefanos Tsitsipas | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (25/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 70% (57/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (451/341) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 82% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 189 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 95 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:14 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 114.12 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1459/2460) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (1076/1459) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (536/1001) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (100/236) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (870/2288) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (21/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 73% (8/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 42% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Stefanos Tsitsipas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Marton Fucsovics
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
51 of
71)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Alex De Minaur
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
77 of
122)
5
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
122)
116
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
89%
(
55 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Dusan Lajovic
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
24 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tsitsipas Vs Gimeno-Traver Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Stefanos Tsitsipas
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
